Kris Alessandro Hernandez Mariona vs Lawrence Bataljin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L L W L L W
Form
W W L L L L W L L LHead-To-Head: Mariona 1 - 0 Bataljin
They have played 1 sets in total, with Mariona winning 1 and Bataljin winning 0. The last match between Mariona and Bataljin was at the M15 Cancun, 22-05-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Kris Alessandro Hernandez Mariona getting the victory 7-6(3) ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kris Alessandro Hernandez Mariona | 1 |
| Lawrence Bataljin | 0 |
M15 Cancun(22-05-2022)
| Mariona | Stats | Bataljin |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (2-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 14% (1-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 24 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 22% (4-14) | Career Total W/L | 43% (156-204) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Vukic VS Nishikori PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) ret. | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 7 | Games Won | 6 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kris Alessandro Hernandez Mariona Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Tobias Sonne
Player
Kris Alessandro Hernandez Mariona
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
Player
Kris Alessandro Hernandez Mariona
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Lawrence Bataljin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 4-6 6-4 12-10 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
Player
Lawrence Bataljin
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
77%
(
20 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lawrence Bataljin
Player
Shourya Manik
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
53
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kabir Hans
Player
Lawrence Bataljin
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Abhinav Sanjeev Shanmugam
Player
Lawrence Bataljin
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
13
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shinji Hazawa
Player
Lawrence Bataljin
46%
(
19 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
Player
Lawrence Bataljin
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lawrence Bataljin
Player
Elijah Cham
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
51%
(
35 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
72
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 16-14 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lawrence Bataljin
Player
Jack Hansen Ratter
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22% (4/14) | Win/Loss | 43% (156/204) |
| 22% (8/28) | Sets Win/Loss | 44% (351/454) |
| 39% (124/193) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (3509/3837) |
| 22% (4/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 46% (95/112) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 41% (58/84) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 4 | Aces Total | 100 |
| 0.03 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 279 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 136.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 85.35 |
| 62% (109/175) | 1st Serve % | 68% (4894/7198) |
| 55% (60/109) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (2760/4894) |
| 32% (21/66) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (997/2304) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (285/673) |
| 33% (51/155) | Return Points Win % | 39% (2828/7185) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 35% (9/17) |
| 22% (4/14) | Futures W/L | 44% (147/187) |
| 18% (3/17) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (154/356) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (23/47) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (48/89) |
| 100% (4/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (146/124) |
| 0% (4/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (146/22) |
| 0% (14/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (214/32) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
